When a Pastor Pronounces “Curses”

7 March 2026

*This article is part of “Dialogues,” where real questions from people are answered by AI and then reviewed by theologians for clarity, accuracy, and faithfulness to Christian teaching.

Question

“Why does a pastor pronounce curses on relatives or Christians? What are the consequences of a pastor who pronounces curses?”

Answer

It can be deeply unsettling to hear that a pastor—someone entrusted with prayer, teaching, and spiritual care—pronounces “curses” over people, especially over fellow Christians or even family members. Because this kind of speech claims spiritual weight, it can do deep harm: it can wound consciences, fracture relationships, and create fear where the gospel intends assurance.

Before saying anything else, it helps to hold two truths together:

  1. We often don’t know the full context—tone, intent, the exact words used, whether it was a misguided attempt at warning, a confused use of “prophetic” rhetoric, or something more serious.
  2. The gospel and the New Testament set a clear direction for Christian speech, especially for those who lead: words are meant to bless, build up, and aim at restoration, not spiritual harm.

Scripture is remarkably realistic about the tongue. That is why it speaks with particular seriousness about speech in the lives of leaders. James warns that teachers will be judged more strictly (James 3:1), and he confronts the contradiction of praising God while cursing people made in God’s likeness (James 3:9–10). In other words, this is not a small matter, and it’s not merely about harsh personality—it’s about spiritual integrity.

At the same time, Christian wisdom resists quick, sweeping condemnation. A single sinful outburst is not the same thing as a settled pattern of spiritual abuse. A pastor may genuinely repent and change; a relationship can be healed. But when “pronouncing curses” becomes regular, defended, or used to control, the consequences tend to be serious for everyone involved.

One consequence is damage to the spiritual atmosphere of the church. Scripture calls believers to pursue peace and mutual upbuilding (Romans 14:19). “Curses” from a pulpit or in pastoral counsel often produce the opposite: fear, confusion, tension, and mistrust. People may become guarded. Some may withdraw. Others may begin to believe that spiritual authority functions through threats rather than through shepherding. Yet the New Testament repeatedly connects correction with gentleness and a desire to win people back rather than crush them (2 Timothy 2:24–25; Galatians 6:1).

Another consequence is loss of credibility and spiritual trust. Proverbs says a good name is precious (Proverbs 22:1), but this is more than reputation. Pastoral ministry depends on trust: people open their lives, confess sin, seek counsel, and ask for prayer. If a pastor’s words feel threatening or spiritually dangerous, trust erodes—and once trust is gone, ministry becomes distorted. People may start relating to the pastor out of fear or dependence instead of freely following Christ.

A further consequence is confusion about the gospel itself. The New Testament’s direction is clear: Christians are to bless rather than curse. Paul writes, “Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse them” (Romans 12:14). Jesus commands His followers to love enemies and pray for those who persecute them (Matthew 5:44). This doesn’t mean the church never warns, corrects, or confronts sin. It does. But the aim is restoration, not harm; repentance, not humiliation; healing, not spiritual intimidation.

This is especially important because the heart of the gospel is that Christ bears what we could not bear, and His people are formed into a community of grace. In Christ, God’s people are not objects of a leader’s maledictions—Christ has borne the curse for us (Galatians 3:13)—so “pronouncing curses” over believers is a grave misuse of spiritual language and authority. In that light, “pronouncing curses” over relatives or Christians can reflect a serious misunderstanding—either of spiritual authority or of how God deals with His people in Christ.

Why would a pastor do this? Such speech can arise from a distorted view of authority, as if leadership gives a person power to doom others. Sometimes it comes from misused “prophetic” rhetoric, confusing biblical warning with personal condemnation. Sometimes it is anger, exhaustion, or unhealed pain spilling into spiritual speech. And sometimes, in the worst cases, it functions as control—using fear to silence questions or enforce loyalty. Because we may not know which of these is happening, wisdom calls for both caution and clarity.

Clarity means saying plainly: the New Testament pattern for pastoral speech is blessing, truth, and restoration. A pastor is called to shepherd, not to intimidate; to build up, not tear down; to correct with gentleness, not to weaponize spiritual language. Caution means avoiding instant verdicts about a person’s heart or salvation based on limited information. The church is full of sinners in need of grace, including leaders. The appropriate Christian response holds both realities together: strong warning against harmful speech, and openness to repentance, accountability, and healing.

Conclusion

We may not know every detail behind a pastor’s words, and Christian charity cautions against rushing into condemnation. Yet Scripture also teaches that speech—especially from a spiritual leader—carries real weight. The gospel forms a people who bless, who speak truth in love, and who aim at restoration. For that reason, a pastor “pronouncing curses” should be treated as a serious warning sign, handled with wisdom, accountability, and a clear commitment to the character of Christ.

More Dialogues